A big thank you to Rebel Raiders fans! Most of the initial print run has been sold - and GMT is already talking making this a "reprinter." The game went on sale in April, and as of the end of June over 60 percent of the print run was sold...and GMT says third quarter figures look great!
For all of you who have bought, played, commented on, reviewed or otherwise expressed interest and support in my strategic naval game of the Civil War, a big THANK YOU....if I wasn't such a Yankee at heart (an ancestor in the Irish Brigade, 69th NY), I'd give a big rebel yell!
So instead, here's a hearty HUZZAH! HUZZAH! HUZZAH!
....and by the way, I started this blog at Easter (when my son built it for me) and it just topped 10,000 views!
..
Showing posts with label boardgamegeek. Show all posts
Showing posts with label boardgamegeek. Show all posts
Thursday, October 10, 2013
Thursday, September 12, 2013
Rebel Raiders Replay Part III: 1864 Loose the Fateful Lightning
Rebel Raiders
Replay: 1862 Jump Start Part III :
1864 Loose the Fateful Lightning
The Developer & A
Naval Historian Team Up Against the Designer in the 1862 Scenario
Parts I and II of the replay describe the initially
successful Confederate defense, followed by the sweeping of the seas of all
things Gray and “The Nightmare Year” of 1863 in which the South was gutted. Undaunted, the Rebels counterattacked, thus
making Union victory far from certain…
With more ships than it had jobs for them to do, throughout
1864 the Union spent most of its builds on buying extra attacks, thus enabling
it to make four assaults a turn. Play of Loose
the Fateful Lightning (USN Card 34) added yet an additional attack for EACH
remaining turn. The Union
used these well, driving still deeper into the South, and then responding to
desperate if successful Rebel counterattacks by regaining for the Union
what the South had but briefly taken back.
The game was still hanging in the balance in December 1864,
normally the final turn of the game. With
five attacks the Union had to conquer three key cities. Mark played the General Pierre Toussaint Beauregard (CSN Card 88) card to build
a battery in newly recaptured Richmond
and also deployed the cream of Confederate leadership: Lee, Jackson and even Longstreet! (CSN Card 79), giving the
South a total of six dice to defend the ruins of the capital. He
also got Memphis back. Now, to win, the Union
would have to once again take Richmond
and the diminished Memphis as well
as the very heavily fortified city of New Orleans .
Fred and Brandon had drawn If It Takes All Summer (USN Card
36), which gives the Union a chance for a
possible 13th Turn. That led
a debate as to whether to go for the game-winning hat trick or attempt to storm
Savannah and Charleston
from newly captured Augusta . They were held by three and two Batteries
each, respectively, but possession of those ports would greatly improve the Union ’s
chances to add an extra game turn through play of that card.
Wary of pinning everything on a single die roll to get that
extra turn, however, Fred and Brandon decided to go all-out for the three key Confederate
cities in a final offensive surge. One
of those attacks was stymied by the Rebel play of Mud-Bound (CSN Card 59). Undaunted,
with Sherman, Grant and other cards
in hand, on to Richmond , Memphis
and New Orleans they came….
Damn Yankees – they
won all three fights, winning the game with but one attack still left in hand…
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
Rebel Raiders Replay: 1862 Jump Start Part II: 1863 The Nightmare Year
The Developer & A
Naval Historian Team Up Against the Designer in the 1862 Scenario
As noted in Part I, the South built up a strong crust
defense and repulsed almost all of the Union ’s attacks
in 1862, yet despite an initial “happy time” was all but swept from the
seas. On to 1863: The Nightmare Year
1863 was a nightmare for the South on land. The Union broke
through the crust defense, playing Three
Cigars (USN Card 45) which
stopped Stonewall Jackson and any Confederate cards from being played and enabled
the Northern capture of Richmond . On
the following turn the Union cracked the line at Chattanooga
– despite a stout defense of three Batteries and J.E. Johnston – and used Grant
and Sherman
(USN
Cards 8 and 50) and other cards to dash down to Atlanta . Suddenly there were no arsenals to build
Batteries and very few Blockade Runners to bring in cargo. There were also fewer
Raiders to destroy Union commerce for Victory Points – and even if more had
survived, each
turn’s Supply Roll penalties for losing Atlanta
and Richmond , as well as the
regular one die roll (three dice in all each turn!) would have rendered their
point contributions moot.
Thus, the rest of 1863 and into 1864 were very difficult for
the Confederacy but Mark did not despair; he mounted inspired counterattacks to
keep the South viable. The Union had built a cordon around Richmond by seizing
Fredericksburg, Norfolk and Goldsboro but Lee and Jackson nonetheless staged a
whirlwind campaign, first recapturing Goldsboro with a regular counter-attack
and then Richmond itself with The South Shall Rise (CSN Card
107) to regain the capital of the
Confederacy. After Island No. 10’s capture, successive waves of Yankee
Ironclads and gunboats conquered Memphis ,
which the South successfully retook with a Counterattack.
The Union responded to this last
Rebel Western Theatre offensive success by marching west out of Union-held Atlanta
to seize Montgomery and Vicksburg
via its land approach and then on to capture the Fort of Baton Rouge. This
was complemented, after several failures, by Farragut at long last capturing
the fort guarding New Orleans from
the Gulf. As the nightmare of 1863 came to an end, the South pinned its hopes
on a pair of Virginia gentlemen
hunkering down in a smoldering Richmond ,
and on New Orleans , which with its
defense of three Batteries, a Gunboat, and an Ironclad though isolated remained
defiant and unbowed.
Tomorrow: 1864 the year the Union players Loose the Fateful Lightning....
Thursday, August 22, 2013
Rebel Raiders Updated on VASSAL
Rebel Raiders Updated on VASSAL
A big Rebel Raiders' thanks to Joel Toppen, for making Rebel Raiders available on VASSAL and for once again updating it!
This is his announcement today of the update:
Version 1.3 of the Rebel Raiders VASSAL module is available:http://www.vassalengine.org/ wiki/ Module:Rebel_Raiders_on_the_Hig h_Seas
Modifications include:
1. Made cargo counters smaller so they don't obscure MPs when stacked on ships.
2. Added Load/Unload functionality to Blockade Runners. Load will dispatch a cargo piece.
3. Added individual "Draw Cards" buttons to each hand window.
4. Added mouse-over zoom to hand windows.
Monday, August 5, 2013
The Healing and Teaching Power of Board Games
My "Napoleonic Wars" Cited as Useful in "Dealing With Stress" and for "Leadership Lessons"
Award-winning fellow wargamer and noted business consultant Scott Pfeiffer featured my Napoleonic Wars boardgame in an article on his company's blog. Entitled "Dealing With Stress: Lessons from a Boardgame," Scott not only said many complimentary things about it ("Trust me, this is a great game,") but also demonstrated how games, and my game in particular, can help teach people and the companies they run or work for some good lessons in how to deal with stress, especially in hard times.
For the full article, please go to http://marshallfredrickco.com/On_Business/stress-boardgame/
On a related note, consultant Richard Bliss mentioned my Napoleonic Wars in his piece in Forbes entitled "Juicy Leadership Lessons...From Boardgames?"
http://www.forbes.com/sites/netapp/2013/07/31/leadership-lessons-boardgames/
....
Award-winning fellow wargamer and noted business consultant Scott Pfeiffer featured my Napoleonic Wars boardgame in an article on his company's blog. Entitled "Dealing With Stress: Lessons from a Boardgame," Scott not only said many complimentary things about it ("Trust me, this is a great game,") but also demonstrated how games, and my game in particular, can help teach people and the companies they run or work for some good lessons in how to deal with stress, especially in hard times.
For the full article, please go to http://marshallfredrickco.com/On_Business/stress-boardgame/
On a related note, consultant Richard Bliss mentioned my Napoleonic Wars in his piece in Forbes entitled "Juicy Leadership Lessons...From Boardgames?"
http://www.forbes.com/sites/netapp/2013/07/31/leadership-lessons-boardgames/
....
Sunday, August 4, 2013
Hudson's Hideout Interviews Mark McLaughlin
10 Questions with game designer Mark McLaughlin
Posted by Jason F
http://hudsonshideout.blogspot.com/2013/08/10-questions-with-game-designer-mark.html
Wednesday, July 24, 2013
What Gamers Are Saying about Rebel Raiders:
“Fun and pretty darn grounded historically;” “what an ingenious game!”
“Simple to play, very
good for solitaire…thanks for taking the risk and breaking new ground.”
Panzer Digest magazine: “Fun
and pretty darn grounded historically;”
-“Katie and I welcome Mark McLaughlin – designer of that
truly awesome game at GMT : Rebel
Raiders. It’s both fun and pretty darn
grounded historically considering the scale – and keeping it playable!”
Michael Syrett (from Scotland ): “Simple to play, very good for
solitaire…thanks for taking the risk and breaking new ground.”
“As a veteran board gamer and purchaser of GMT
products (I have 30 of your games), I’d like to congratulate Mark McLaughlin
and Fred Schachter on their excellent new offering Rebel Raiders on the High
Seas. The naval war between the States
has been the one aspect of ACW gaming that has been sadly neglected. This game, along with Iron & Oak, more
than fills the gap. It is simple to
play, very good for solitaire – yet covers most of the key events. It is right up there among my top five
favourite games. Many thanks for taking
the risk and breaking new ground.”
Paul Pressler (on
Consimworld): “what
an ingenious game!” “We have had a
really great time!”
Wednesday, June 5, 2013
Boardgamegeek Praises, Recommends Rebel Raiders in After Action Report
In an after action report posted on June 3, on Boardgamegeek, J.R. Tracy calls Rebel Raiders on the High Seas: "a surprisingly light and breezy (in a good way) treatment of a sprawling topic. The vast scope of the naval war was captured in a way that still left room for a little tactical nuance in terms of deployment and combat resolution. The cards add a lot of flavor...."
To read the after action report (which begins with a brief AAR of a short Advanced Squad Leader game) go to:
http://www.boardgamegeek.com/blogpost/20077/aar-3-june-2013-advanced-squad-leader-rebel-raid
More Praise for Rebel Raiders:
"A very entertaining game," says John Bolash in a posting last week on ConSimWorld. "Oodles of choices to make and opportunities for variation."
...and this from Steve Duke, commenting on the postings on my blog of the Replay of the game between Naval Historian Brandon Musler and myself (which will resume tomorrow with Turn 6)....
"I think it says a lot (in a good way) that the designer wants to play his game after all the toil to produce it. I hear sometimes/often that is not the case."
In an after action report posted on June 3, on Boardgamegeek, J.R. Tracy calls Rebel Raiders on the High Seas: "a surprisingly light and breezy (in a good way) treatment of a sprawling topic. The vast scope of the naval war was captured in a way that still left room for a little tactical nuance in terms of deployment and combat resolution. The cards add a lot of flavor...."
To read the after action report (which begins with a brief AAR of a short Advanced Squad Leader game) go to:
http://www.boardgamegeek.com/blogpost/20077/aar-3-june-2013-advanced-squad-leader-rebel-raid
More Praise for Rebel Raiders:
"A very entertaining game," says John Bolash in a posting last week on ConSimWorld. "Oodles of choices to make and opportunities for variation."
...and this from Steve Duke, commenting on the postings on my blog of the Replay of the game between Naval Historian Brandon Musler and myself (which will resume tomorrow with Turn 6)....
"I think it says a lot (in a good way) that the designer wants to play his game after all the toil to produce it. I hear sometimes/often that is not the case."
Sunday, June 2, 2013
Rebel Raiders Replay (Turn 4)
Designer Mark
McLaughlin as CSA ; Naval Historian Brandon Musler as USA
When we last left our
happy warriors,, the Union had taken Louisville only to suffer a horrifying defeat at Nashville – costing them 10 Victory Points and a key
Card. The South, however, is not smiling
too broadly, as the Blockade is tightening and the Union is capturing Blockade Runners almost as fast as the Confederacy can
build them…
Turn 4 – April
1862 The Battle of Island No. 10
The South’s joy over holding Nashville
is tempered by the loss of FOUR Blockade Runners, all fully loaded with 2 VP
each! Still, despite those losses 10 VP
of cargo make it through the blockade, and the Raiders manage to squeeze 3 more
VP. The South places the Ironclad
built last turn in Memphis , and spends
20 VP to start building another Ironclad.
Once again, a Raider and four Blockade Runners are built. (As it is now 1862, two of those Blockade Runners may be and are built in foreign ports).
Beauregard (Card 88) shows up, allowing placement of a
third battery instead of the usual two a turn, and these go in Nashville,
Chattanooga and Memphis, as Brandon has been steadily building up Ironclads and
gunboats in the West.
The Battle for Island No. 10
--
On the first round, two Union and one
Confederate Gunboat are sunk.
On the second round, another Union Gunboat goes down – but
the Yankees destroy the Battery and sink the other Rebel
Gunboat.
This paves the way for the attack on the fort space
itself. As it is now 1862 the North is
no longer at a disadvantage and is rolling two dice a turn in combat, the same
number of basic dice as the South. To make sure the Confederacy can’t change
the odds Brandon plays “Three Cigars” (Card 45) (as that Union card prevents the South from playing cards
in the fight. Island No. 10 falls; it
is the first piece of Southern territory to be reintegrated into the Union . (See photo of game map below).
…but not without company; St. Augustine
falls to the Union Navy in an amphibious assault. It is the first Southern city to fall.
All the South can do
to take its revenge is to play Royal
Navy (Card 62) (as allowed by the previous play of
the Trent Card) – forcing the North
to build 3 Screw Sloops to put on the Royal
Navy card (to “watch” the British
fleet that was assembled at Halifax ).
Saturday, June 1, 2013
Rebel Raiders Replay (Turn 3)
Designer Mark
McLaughlin as CSA ; Naval Historian Brandon Musler as USA
When we last left our intrepid
gamers, the Union had been rebuffed twice at Louisville , and the Confederacy was enjoying the first
“happy time” running the blockade…
Turn 3 –
December 1861
The “happy time” is no more.
The Thin Blue Line rounds up THREE Blockade Runners in the Caribbean
(one fewer than the South built last turn), and all of those were stacked with
cargo, so it is a double loss! The
remainder manage to unload a mere 7 VP – most of which is eaten up by the
attrition roll in the Supply Phase – and the two Raiders contribute nothing,
finding no targets to sink or ransom.
(NB: The South wants
VP to build extra ships and defenses, buy extra cards and counterattacks – but
also needs VP to keep getting three cards a turn).
Fortunately the Tredegar
Iron Works (Card 95) gives the South an extra battery,
one of which goes to setting down an Ironclad.
(The others are placed in Savannah
and, as seems fitting, Richmond ,
where those Iron Works were situated).
The South also builds a Raider and 3 Blockade Runners (to replace the 3
it lost), and spends 20 VP to build an Ironclad.
Heady with victory, Brandon
decides to rush for Nashville , which
has no Battery, so it is two Rebel to one Yankee die. The Union rolls a “1”
and the South a “6”, which instead of a loss of merely 5 VP is doubled to 10 by
play of Card 102 - Matthew Brady. To
add insult to injury, this card also requires the Union
to discard a card at random from its hand as further penance for its
battlefield loss.
At the start of the Union Build Phase the Confederacy plays Corruption (Card 58) – increasing the cost to build Union ships this turn and
forcing the discard of Yankee Guns (Card 3) – which gives the Union Screw
Sloops and Ironclads some re-rolls.
The North builds 3 Screw Sloops….which cost 2 each not just
1 due to Corruption.
Friday, May 31, 2013
Rebel Raiders Replay (Turn 2)
Designer Mark McLaughlin
as CSA ; Naval Historian Brandon Musler as USA
When we last left our
plucky warriors, the South had taken Louisville and strengthened Wilmington , and had a fleet of Blockade Runners ready
to race in to deliver their cargo…
Turn 2- August
1861
Although one Blockade Runner is caught, the rest scurry
through to unload 16 VPs of cargo – truly an auspicious beginning to the
Southern “happy time.” (If the South can’t
make the VP in these early turns, they never will). Confederate Batteries are
placed in New Berne and Key West ,
an aptly named “key” port as it allows Blockade Runners from all directions a
refuge – and is a short hop for in-and-out runs to the many nearby foreign
ports. Four Blockade Runners and a Raider are built.
The North decides that despite the poor odds the Union
will try to take Louisville : even with the South rolling three dice (two
for being Southern, one for the battery) vs. his one die, the first attack is a
close run thing, but the Union loses by 1 and gives the
South a VP. Second attack, however, is a
rout: a difference of 5 on the dice –
and a corresponding gain of 5 VP for the South.
To be continued…..
Labels:
American Civil War,
blockade runners,
board games,
boardgamegeek,
civil war,
Confederate,
double-ender gunboats,
game replay,
gmt,
ironclads,
Jon Dahlgren,
naval,
navy,
raiders,
rebel raiders,
War upon the Waters
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
"Inside the Box" of Rebel Raiders by The Gaming Gang - and some "Wow" Praise
Jeff McAleer of The Gaming Gang has an 11-minute "inside the box" preview of Rebel Raiders. His preview is very upbeat, and he says especially nice things about the Playbook - "I love the GMT Playbook!" says Jeff, because it includes "historical info," "how to play the game," and "rules for advanced play." All of that, says Jeff, "really helps turn a light bulb on in my head."
http://thegaminggang.com/2013/05/tgg-inside-the-box-rebel-raiders-on-the-high-seas-from-gmt-games-video/
Two AARs of the game were posted on Consimworld this weekend.
"We'll definitely play again"
Allen Hill in his report called it "A fun game, not least for providing detail to the naval campaign while abstracting the land struggle. The Union player has to be prepared to watch blockade runners and raiders roll successfully time after time, with nothing to do for it, but then the tide turns as the Union economy and land forces grow in strength and effectiveness. We'll definitely play again!"
"All I can say was....WOW!"...."What a great strategic game!"
Pat Kairns wrote in his comments: "It's rare that a game 'grabs me' as quickly as RR."...and "This IMHO is a MUST play game!" "What a great strategic game" and "had a blast!"
Jeff McAleer of The Gaming Gang has an 11-minute "inside the box" preview of Rebel Raiders. His preview is very upbeat, and he says especially nice things about the Playbook - "I love the GMT Playbook!" says Jeff, because it includes "historical info," "how to play the game," and "rules for advanced play." All of that, says Jeff, "really helps turn a light bulb on in my head."
http://thegaminggang.com/2013/05/tgg-inside-the-box-rebel-raiders-on-the-high-seas-from-gmt-games-video/
Two AARs of the game were posted on Consimworld this weekend.
"We'll definitely play again"
Allen Hill in his report called it "A fun game, not least for providing detail to the naval campaign while abstracting the land struggle. The Union player has to be prepared to watch blockade runners and raiders roll successfully time after time, with nothing to do for it, but then the tide turns as the Union economy and land forces grow in strength and effectiveness. We'll definitely play again!"
"All I can say was....WOW!"...."What a great strategic game!"
Pat Kairns wrote in his comments: "It's rare that a game 'grabs me' as quickly as RR."...and "This IMHO is a MUST play game!" "What a great strategic game" and "had a blast!"
Saturday, May 25, 2013
A Game in New York City --- After Action Report to Follow
Yesterday I went to New York City and played Rebel Raiders with my friend Brandon, who knows more about all things naval than any other person (save one) I know. (That other one is Christopher Vorder Bruegge, another old friend who also served as historical consultant for the game).
It was a lot of fun to finally play with my own game in its published form. I will be posting turn-by-turn after action reports of the game over the next week, in between "This Day in Rebel Raiders History" and other entries. I figure it is better to present it in small bites, rather than put it all on the table at once. Suffice it to say that we start out nice and slow, but the game gathers speed quickly, and Turn 7 (April 1863) was the real thriller -- where we dumped half of our hands in one battle.....
More anon....in the meantime, a good Memorial Day Weekend to all....
Yesterday I went to New York City and played Rebel Raiders with my friend Brandon, who knows more about all things naval than any other person (save one) I know. (That other one is Christopher Vorder Bruegge, another old friend who also served as historical consultant for the game).
It was a lot of fun to finally play with my own game in its published form. I will be posting turn-by-turn after action reports of the game over the next week, in between "This Day in Rebel Raiders History" and other entries. I figure it is better to present it in small bites, rather than put it all on the table at once. Suffice it to say that we start out nice and slow, but the game gathers speed quickly, and Turn 7 (April 1863) was the real thriller -- where we dumped half of our hands in one battle.....
More anon....in the meantime, a good Memorial Day Weekend to all....
Thursday, May 16, 2013
This day 150 years ago in Rebel Raiders’ History
-Dedicated to Civil War episodes, battles, people and ships
that also appear in my game, GMT ’s Rebel Raiders on the High Seas,
Historical Event: Champion’s Hill. Two Union corps under generals McPherson and
McClernand repeatedly attack Confederate forces on Champion’s Hill. Although the combat is indecisive,
Confederate general Pemberton decides to retreat – but instead of marching to
link up with J.E. Johnston as ordered, he decides to fall back upon Vicksburg . It is a fatal decision, as not only with the
South lose the city in two months, Pemberton’s 20,000-man army will fall with
it.
Game Connection: Vicksburg
is one of the three key cities, along with New Orleans
and Memphis , which the Union
needs to take to control the Mississippi . Taking those cites not only costs the
Confederate player much needed supplies (represented in victory points lost
through die rolls each turn) but is also
one of the key conditions of victory for the Union.
Labels:
American Civil War,
blockade runners,
board games,
boardgamegeek,
Boardgamegeek review,
Champion's Hill,
civil war,
Confederate,
McClernand,
McPherson,
Mississippi,
Pemberton,
raiders,
rebel raiders,
Vicksburg
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
GMT Sale -- Get Rebel Raiders for Half Price!
GMT is having a big sale - for a limited time order one or two games and get them at half off the list price...This offer applies to Rebel Raiders and Iron & Oak as well as their other games...this means you can game the Civil War on the strategic level with Rebel Raiders, and fight out most of the naval actions tactically with Iron & Oak (as the rules in Rebel Raiders' playbook describes) -- all for the price of just one game!
GMT is having a big sale - for a limited time order one or two games and get them at half off the list price...This offer applies to Rebel Raiders and Iron & Oak as well as their other games...this means you can game the Civil War on the strategic level with Rebel Raiders, and fight out most of the naval actions tactically with Iron & Oak (as the rules in Rebel Raiders' playbook describes) -- all for the price of just one game!
|
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


















